In the cybercrime law, any criticism of an official institution is considered a threat to national security. I once said: A teacher said: "The school resembles a mental clinic!" I was accused of threatening national security!
What about the new social security law?! Did it threaten national security?! - Social harmony?!
- Confidence in the state and its projects?
- People turning away from official rhetoric?
- Losing hope for the future?
All this happened, and no charges were brought against the perpetrators!!
(1)
Initial repercussions from their amendments!
A number of initial effects of the social security law amendments can be observed, and several conclusions can be drawn, leaving the judgement to the public to say: Who "messed up" the world? - Is it the citizens filled with despair by the law?
_ Or the lawmakers who filled us with frustration and despair?
Let's go back to the repercussions!
(2)
Security apparatus tension!
The amendments provoked widespread reactions among the public, from those calling to withdraw their money from the security, to those calling for legal action against the government, to calls for sit-ins, gatherings, and disruptions. I don't have information, but it is clearly inferred that the security apparatuses monitored everything, faced with new concerns!
(3)
Restoring confidence in the Islamic Action Front
Those who followed the events fully understand how people rallied around the deputies who took a clear stance on the security law, led by the Islamic Action Front deputies who stood firmly against the amendments; advocating for the citizens and their financial rights!! In my estimation, if elections were held now, they would win the majority. Bravo, security law!!
(4)
Mr. President!
The president visited a party that showed no concern about the security law, and he could have turned to the people, and to the oppressed group; to hear their fiery words about how worried they are, and the danger the law poses to their fate. A mourner is not like a renter!!
Therefore, the president is asked to withdraw the law, not just amend it!
And this is the least of the people's demands.
(5)
The law shook confidence in the government!!
Yes, many called for the resignation of officials, and they were accused of many charges such as, being responsible for all the events: early retirement, huge salaries, and brilliant management of the security… etc.
(6)
The tale of sustainability
When the law conflicts with the interests of the people, the people have the right to express their discomfort and rejection! And when sacrifices are demanded from the people, they are prepared under the condition of fairness, and no one sacrifices for the benefit of a group that took huge salaries, or for the benefit of administrations that achieved abysmal failure at the national level!
True sustainability is the rights of the citizen, and their confidence in their state, and nothing else!
The required: Accountability of those who created a security and national problem alike!! And those who made the Brotherhood heroes, and those who introduced despair into our hearts!
_ It's not sustainability that's needed, but justice and sustainability!
_ It's not concessions from 65 to 63 that are needed, but the preservation of rights!
Make a new law, put all the provisions, provided that it applies to everyone who will trust you from now on!
Do you get what I'm saying?! Khaberni
