Despite the importance of the event and its immense impact on the whole world; Trump was not prepared to handle a new burden on top of his existing ones, away from the technical and technical details of the attack operation, which allow interpretations that do not permit a decisive charge against any political entity; in addition to the simplicity of the execution and its naivety when compared to politically motivated assassinations, and beyond considerations of the perpetrator's background, the attack may have been a planned orchestration, and it might have been spontaneous, occurring in the moment, regardless of the legitimacy of his carrying a weapon in his location. In assassination operations, there is a golden objective that surpasses hitting the targeted person, which is: not knowing the planning entity; for this, the use of explosive belts, or a person other than the perpetrator who undertakes the killing or smuggling, is employed, and this did not happen, at least it has not been apparent that something like this was part of the process.
In the realm of politics, it seems that contrary to what many expect, Trump's stocks fell further in the "Trump war" index. This was evident in the confusion of his statement at a moment that combined the need for the enormity of the event and the necessity to minimize it; he used the sanctity settings stored in his idea of managing the country's affairs, which does not understand sanctity from the aspect of spirituality in which he tries wearing "veils" protective against domestic envy and foreign predation. The sanctity of this country stems from a security that cannot begin from a place other than the pocket of the citizen who has left some of his leaders straying from supporting Trump himself, turning instead to stone him as the antichrist.
Regarding the need for amplification: Trump leaned towards the sacred mission that enabled him to disperse it across the world from his position that governs the fate of people and their dreams on all of Earth, not only this: this sanctity required him, in his view, to carry the burdens of confronting Iran and its nuclear and armament capabilities which resulted, according to his statement, in this targeting; aiming to undermine his pursuit of security and peace for the whole world; it is an inevitable consequence, in his opinion, of anyone who does what he does sacredly.
In the same phrases, and before he interspersed them with ellipses; a flash in Trump’s mind: that amplifying the event; necessarily means sealing a conviction of himself in front of the Democrats who were exhausted by attempts to define his powers in Congress—with others as well—based on what his own hands had committed against the people of the United States before others, not only this; but this state of shock dominated the formation of the terror that befell him—more than the shooting incident itself—when he imagined that accusations from the public and its discontent were on their way to unite with the Democrats in an unusual form that pushes to overturn the usual; when a considerable number of his followers follow the policies of his opponents; placing before his eyes matters far more challenging than the idea of the coming midterm renewal, he recalibrated the necessity of reminding of a domestic, peaceful resolution to conflicts; forced to count all poles of American politics without focusing on targeting them while he preserved his accusations against the Democrats, and taking general terms related to the possibility that the operation might have tried to target others among the officials. In general, the word means that: it may be one of the security officials at the reception entrance.
In another aspect and on the Israeli support side: Trump was not very pleased with Netanyahu's joy, which descended from a sky of confusion that perplexed Netanyahu whenever he thought about how to push for resuming fighting with Iran, in contrast to Trump’s inability to move in any direction that would make him—without a doubt—a tie knot between Israel and Iran, there would be no greater loser than him, we need to see this as we look at the lack of Netanyahu's interest in killing Trump or even in his weakening, if he could have provided any help to him, he would have done so, if Netanyahu had planned such an operation with the aim of pushing Trump to walk according to his whims; he would have controlled it in a way that does not lead to identifying the perpetrator or catching him, this fate that Netanyahu ended up with Trump formed one of the stages of decline in Trump's momentum and optimism index.
As for the enemy Iran, if the assassination attempt - if its conceptions are correct - cuts off the path Trump had taken in smuggling plans, when he stopped the attacks on Iran and began meddling stealthily behind the lines of this truce; using fields in Lebanon, Iraq, and the reserve in Bab al-Mandab, at a time when Iran does not want to exacerbate its situation to go into a silly and failed attempt like this, Trump was unable to collect enough patches to attribute it to them, preferring to separate the incident from Iran's war, we will leave the details of that for later.
Finally, we remind what we said earlier about our indifference to the American intelligence information that toppled Trump's confidence in his officials who started falling one after the other due to Trump's own coup against them, the assassination operation will be nothing but a severe strike against the wall of trust around him, it won’t push him to changes in their forms only, but also in their tasks, their possible deliberate failure may not be intended, it might just be a lack of care created by the state of weakness Trump ended up in and distrust in his conceptions, above this and that: Trump's own boldness will also be subject to change, whether internally or externally, it seems that his statements from now on will not be free, he will start or indeed has already started paying the tax for using words whenever he finds himself a bit away from his wife.
