Khaberni - Dr. Youssef Obaidallah Khreisat wrote:
Satire in public opinion cannot be overlooked as it reflects the level of national awareness, the extent of trust in institutions, and the effectiveness of officials. Often, satire serves as an alarm bell revealing the fragility of performance.
Jordan faces significant challenges that require officials to demonstrate the utmost presence, commitment, and transparency. The true management style becomes apparent during crises like the recent damage caused by weather depressions.
When citizens see some officials less attentive and concerned, and others closely monitoring reality—as seen in the sarcastic comparisons between the American ambassador and the Jordanian official—satire goes beyond mere joking. It becomes a tool of pressure that might be difficult to control.
Satire is an implicit warning that trust is shaken and that the official performance needs reevaluating. The gap in event monitoring or crisis management leaves room for doubt and dissatisfaction, and this mockery could evolve into a crisis that threatens stability and possibly national security.
The effort required from a Jordanian official is not just media appearance but also being involved in the intricate, daily details and being genuine and effective in crisis management. An official who adheres to this proves their credibility, whereas one who ignores the satire might put themselves at risk of losing trust and increasing public pressure.
A smart official who takes satire seriously and responds to public opinion requirements can turn it into an opportunity to correct and improve performance. Hard work, transparency, and perseverance are all tools to protect public opinion and ensure it does not become a threat to national security.
The Jordanian official who understands this reality and acts accordingly ensures the stability of state institutions, gains the people's trust, and builds a strong foundation for protecting the nation during crises.
Paying attention to satire on social media is an indicator of a perspective in public opinion, often critical of performance and conveying profound ideas in a humorous and sarcastic manner.
