Khaberni - The race in the world of artificial intelligence no longer revolves around making the smartest robot or the fastest algorithm, but has become a global struggle over the "digital mind" most capable of thinking like a human, from Silicon Valley in California to research centers in Shanghai. Giant technology companies are racing to produce the smartest and most influential model among users.
In this context, "24" sheds light on the best artificial intelligence models by comparing the top 5 most famous models, utilizing writings and opinions of tech experts at technology sites like "Thomas Guide" and "Android Headlines".
Who prevails among the five artificial intelligence models that dominate today's battleground: "ChatGPT-5" owned by the American company "Open AI", "Claude" from "Anthropic", "Gemini" from Google, "Grok" from Elon Musk’s "xAI", and finally "DeepSeek" owned by China's "Alibaba"?
First Round: "Chat GPT" faces "Deep Seek"
In an initial test conducted by "Thomas Guide", the two models were pitted against each other in 9 varied tests, including logical and mathematical problems, financial planning, writing short stories, and giving family advice.
The results were surprising, as "Deep Seek" excelled in most tasks thanks to its precise analysis and logical, structured steps with practical, applicable responses.
In the mathematical puzzle test, "Deep Seek" provided the solution methodically with complete explanations, whereas "ChatGPT-5" only gave the correct answer without sufficient clarification.
In tests on financial planning and setting budgets for families or small businesses, "Deep Seek" demonstrated practical awareness of costs and budgeting, presenting regulated plans supported by figures, thereby surpassing its rival in accuracy and implementation.
Conversely, "Chat GPT 5" excelled in tasks requiring a "human touch". When tasked with writing a humorous short story about "an alien trying out bubble tea", it outshone its competitor with its smooth and enjoyable style. It also excelled in summarizing the plot of "Stranger Things" in a simplified manner suitable for children.
In short, "Deep Seek" possesses significant capabilities in analytical and methodological subjects, while "Chat GPT" excels in storytelling that requires a human or spiritual touch.
Of nine rounds, the Chinese model won seven, while the American model won two rounds related to narration and creativity.
Second Round: "Gemini" against "Claude" and "Grok"
In another test among the three models, "Claude", "Gemini", and "Grok", it focused on assessing their abilities in real-life scenarios including logical thinking, analyzing information, generating humor, and writing content in various styles, and discussing ethical issues.
"Gemini" prevailed in 4 out of 7 rounds, thanks to its ability to quickly analyze up-to-date information and engage socially, demonstrating excellence in handling daily tasks, time management, and crafting posts for social media publication.
Meanwhile, "Claude" shined in rounds requiring critical analysis or stylistic diversity, especially when writing a news story in the "New York Times" style followed by "BuzzFeed" style, showing a unique ability to switch tones and tailor language to the nature of the platform.
On the other hand, "Grok" performed acceptably in most tasks but did not excel in any, showing commitment to logic and consistency, although its results were described as "safer rather than innovative".
According to a report by "Thomas Guide", "Gemini" emerged clearly victorious from this round, benefiting from its balance between accuracy, speed, and practicality in daily responses.
Comprehensive analysis of the strengths and weaknesses among the five models
Through multiple tests, the new map of smart conversational technology and the strengths and weaknesses of the most famous artificial intelligence models become clear, as follows:
1 - "DeepSeek": It excels in precise analysis, practical implementation, and clear logic, but its style is dry and lacks a human or humanitarian touch.
2 - "ChatGPT-5": It has the ability to interact naturally and narrate stories in a creative human style, but it sometimes surpasses the instructions given to it and its accuracy decreases in calculations and analytical statistical work.
3 - "Gemini": It enjoys high response speed, rich social content, and continuous updates, but its ability is relatively superficial in deep analysis.
4 - "Claude": This model distinguishes itself with diverse styling, deep criticism, and linguistic creativity, but it is relatively slow in practical performance compared to its predecessors.
5 - "Grok": Considered from realistic and rule-abiding models, making its content "non-creative and limited", alongside its lack of boldness.
What is the strongest and best model?
These tests lead to an "important result": so far, there is no comprehensive artificial intelligence model that possesses all strengths internally or overtakes others in "all tasks", which also indicates that competition among these models will intensify in the coming months and years; for reaching an unprecedented level of "intelligence and human understanding", in an attempt to dominate "everything".
Currently, the model deemed "the strongest and most distinctive artificial intelligence" depends on the user’s need; those immersed in educational and complex analytical tasks always consider "Deep Seek" the best for its more accurate results compared to others.
Meanwhile, those seeking creative, narrative, interactive, and human touches closest to humans consider "Chat GPT 5" the strongest.
As for those who use artificial intelligence on a daily basis in content production and swift work, "Gemini" is of course the most practical and effective choice, while "Claude" suits those seeking critical thinking and linguistic depth, and "Grok" for those who prefer clear, known answers without surprises.
