Khaberni - The Rased Center announced in its annual report on the performance of Dr. Jaafar Hassan's government that the Cabinet issued 30 decisions during its first year to appoint 42 leadership positions, within a total of 771 government decisions taken during the same period, which included economic, administrative, and developmental files.
The Rased Center also announced the results of the annual report on the performance of Dr. Jaafar Hassan's government, which included an analysis of the decisions approved by the Cabinet over the year and an analysis of economic decisions and appointments, in addition to tracking the field visits of the Prime Minister. The report also included a survey of deputies' opinions on the government's performance after its first year, where direct questions were posed to parliamentarians on various aspects related to their opinion on the government's performance therein, and 96% of the deputies responded to the survey. In the same context, the report included a survey of the opinions of Jordanian political parties, which all responded to it.
The report's results indicated that the Prime Minister conducted 33 field visits during the year, covering 114 sites distributed across 32 districts, 3 governorates, and 43 municipalities. The health sector topped the list of visits with a total of 29 visits, including 17 to health centers and 12 to hospitals, followed by the education sector with 24 school visits, then the agricultural production, industrial, vocational, and technical training sector with 22 facilities, factories, and training centers. The visits also included 21 centers and associations within the social care and local services sector, and 11 centers and clubs within the youth sector, in addition to 7 visits to tourist and archaeological sites in various governorates.
The report also showed that the government made 771 decisions during its first year, and the analysis of the decisions indicated that the government took 212 economic decisions directly linked to the economic modernization vision. In the same context, the government approved 25 decisions that included settling 12,240 tax disputes with individuals and companies at the Income and Sales Tax Department, and appointed 42 leadership positions through 30 decisions during its first year.
The results of analyzing the government decisions showed that the economic decisions numbered 212, and the analysis of the decisions based on the economic growth drivers in the economic modernization vision revealed that efforts were mainly focused on the investment driver, which accounted for the largest proportion of the overall decisions at 32.8%. The future services driver ranked second at 20.1%, while the sustainable resources driver ranked third at 18.8%. The "Jordan as a Global Destination" driver was at 11.9%, while the innovation and entrepreneurship driver was at 4.1%. The remaining percentages were distributed among quality of life at 5.9%, a sustainable environment at 3.2%, and high-value industries at 3.2%, reflecting a balanced approach that links sustainable economic growth with improving the quality of life and enhancing the competitiveness of productive sectors.
The results from the survey of deputies indicated that 63% of the deputies stated that the government's competence was good to excellent in fulfilling its responsibilities during its first year—13.64% excellent, and 49.24% good. Meanwhile, 37% of the deputies stated that the government's competence was acceptable to poor—9.55% poor, and 27.27% acceptable. Revisiting the survey conducted by Rased after the first 100 days of the government, it became apparent that 66% of the deputies assessed the government's ability to fulfill its responsibilities as fully capable to some extent.
Regarding the deputies' satisfaction with the government's communication and coordination with the parliament, it appeared that 40% of the deputies were satisfied, with details showing 8.3% very satisfied, 31.8% satisfied, and the dissatisfied percentage was 60%, with 40% not satisfied and 19.7% completely dissatisfied.
In terms of assessing the government's ability to manage the crises and challenges it faced, the survey results showed that 47.7% of the deputies rated the government's performance from "good" to "excellent", with 37.1% considering the performance "good", and 10.6% viewing it as "excellent". Conversely, 52.3% of the deputies rated the government's performance between "acceptable" and "poor", with 27.3% describing it as "acceptable" and 25% as "poor".
In terms of deputies' satisfaction with the government's efforts in promoting economic reform, including improving financial performance and reducing the fiscal deficit, the survey results showed that 44.7% of the deputies expressed satisfaction with the government's performance, with 31.8% stating they were "satisfied", while 12.9% were very satisfied. Conversely, 55.3% of the deputies expressed dissatisfaction with the government's efforts in this area, with 37.9% stating they were "not satisfied", and 17.4% "completely dissatisfied".
Regarding the deputies' assessment of the government's commitment to protecting human rights and public freedoms, the survey results showed that 44.7% of the deputies rated the government's performance between "good" and "excellent", with 32.6% considering it "good", and 12.1% seeing it as "excellent", while 55.3% of the deputies rated the government's performance between "acceptable" and "poor", with 25% describing it as "acceptable" and 30.3% as "poor".
Regarding the deputies' satisfaction with the government's performance in addressing unemployment and creating job opportunities, the survey results showed that 13.6% of the deputies expressed their satisfaction, with 9.9% stating they were "satisfied" and 3.8% "very satisfied", while 86.4% of the deputies expressed their dissatisfaction with the government's performance in this file, with 53% stating they were "not satisfied" and 33.3% "completely dissatisfied".
In the context of assessing the deputies' evaluation of the government's performance in developing health services and medical care, the survey results showed that 41.7% of the deputies rated the performance between "good" and "excellent", with 30.3% considering it "good", and 11.4% viewing it as "excellent", while 58.3% of the deputies rated the government's performance between "acceptable" and "poor", with 40.9% describing it as "acceptable" and 17.4% as "poor".
Regarding the deputies' satisfaction with the government's efforts])**
